DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 1.5% less intelligence, 76.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 15.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 38.9 | −1.5% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 1.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $1,184.90 | +76.3% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 76.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.98s | 17.34s | +15.8% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 15.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill