DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) scores 2.6 points higher (24.4 vs 21.8) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($121 vs $61.9; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.5.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 21.8 | −10.7% MiMo-V2.5 is 10.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $61.93 | −48.9% MiMo-V2.5 is 48.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 41.73s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 10.7% less intelligence, 48.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill