DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)
Muse Glimmer (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 28.3% less intelligence, 20.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 17.5 | −28.3% Muse Glimmer (High) is 28.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $145.77 | +20.3% Muse Glimmer (High) is 20.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 24.79s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill