DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 0.8 points higher (25.2 vs 24.4) but costs 3.5× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $121; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Plus when you need intelligence above 24.4, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) when 24.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 25.2 | +3.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 3.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $427.73 | +252.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 3.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 44.78s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 3.3% more intelligence, 252.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill