DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 62.3% less intelligence, 234.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 9.2 | −62.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 62.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $405.10 | +234.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 6.44s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill