DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Ring-2.6-1T
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or Ring-2.6-1T by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)
Ring-2.6-1T vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 32.0% less intelligence, 374.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Ring-2.6-1T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 16.6 | −32.0% Ring-2.6-1T is 32.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $575.60 | +374.9% Ring-2.6-1T is 4.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 24.17s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Ring-2.6-1T is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Ring-2.6-1TToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/ring-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/ring-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill