DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max): 38.4% more intelligence, 3.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 33.5 | +38.4% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 38.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $159.30 | $153.58 | −3.6% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 3.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 99.21s | 6.61s | −93.3% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 93.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill