DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 1.7 points higher (26.3 vs 24.6) but costs 5.2× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $191; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 24.6, and DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effor… when 24.6 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.6 | 26.3 | +6.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 6.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $190.88 | $992.88 | +420.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 5.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 41.22s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.28 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort): 6.9% more intelligence, 420.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 34.80 for $179.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill