DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 1.0 points higher (25.2 vs 24.2) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $149; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3.7 Plus when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 25.2 | +4.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 4.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.48 | $427.73 | +186.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 2.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 104.63s | 46.03s | −56.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 56.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max): 4.1% more intelligence, 186.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill