DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 19.2 points higher (34.8 vs 15.6) but costs 6.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $156; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when you need intelligence above 15.6, and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when 15.6 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 15.6 | −55.2% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 55.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $155.87 | −85.6% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 85.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 6.15s | −61.4% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 61.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.25 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 55.2% less intelligence, 85.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 61.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill