DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 14.7% less intelligence, 79.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 29.7 | −14.7% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 14.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $1,935.39 | +79.0% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 79.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.37s | 24.90s | +62.0% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 62.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gemini-3-1-pro-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gemini-3-1-pro-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill