DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs GLM-5.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or GLM-5.3 (Max) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Max) scores 10.0 points higher (44.8 vs 34.8) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($2503 vs $1081; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GLM-5.3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | GLM-5.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 44.8 | +28.7% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 28.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $2,503.48 | +131.5% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 28.79s | +80.5% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 80.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
GLM-5.3 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 28.7% more intelligence, 131.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GLM-5.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)GLM-5.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/glm-5-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/glm-5-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill