DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs GPT-5.5 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) scores 3.6 points higher (38.4 vs 34.8) but costs 4.9× as much to run the benchmark ($5294 vs $1081; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 34.8, and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when 34.8 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 38.4 | +10.3% GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) is 10.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $5,294.36 | +389.6% GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) is 4.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.35s | 44.76s | +191.6% GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) is 191.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $5.00 / $30.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 10.3% more intelligence, 389.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 191.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)GPT-5.5 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-5-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-5-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill