DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs GPT-5.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 2.2 points higher (37.0 vs 34.8) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $1081; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 34.8, and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when 34.8 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | GPT-5.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 37.0 | +6.3% GPT-5.5 (High) is 6.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $3,410.76 | +215.4% GPT-5.5 (High) is 3.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 20.37s | +27.7% GPT-5.5 (High) is 27.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $5.00 / $30.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.5 (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 6.3% more intelligence, 215.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 27.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)GPT-5.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-5-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-5-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill