DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) scores 3.2 points higher (38.0 vs 34.8) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1187 vs $1081; both premium class). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 38.0 | +9.2% GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is 9.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $1,186.77 | +9.7% GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is 9.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.46s | 33.69s | +117.9% GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is 117.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 9.2% more intelligence, 9.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 117.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill