DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 17.0 points higher (51.8 vs 34.8) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1082 vs $1081; both premium class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 51.8 | +48.9% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 48.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $1,081.55 | +0.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 0.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.37s | 220.48s | +1334.5% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 1334.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 48.9% more intelligence, 0.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1334.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-6-1-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-6-1-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill