DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs GPT-6 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 0.6 points higher (34.8 vs 34.2) but costs 4.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $269; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when you need intelligence above 34.2, and GPT-6 Sol (Low) when 34.2 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | GPT-6 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 34.2 | −1.7% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 1.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $268.73 | −75.2% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 75.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 6.18s | −61.3% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 61.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 1.7% less intelligence, 75.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 61.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)GPT-6 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-6-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-6-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill