DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Grok 4.6 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.6 (Low)
Grok 4.6 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 0.9% more intelligence, 43.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 15.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 35.1 | +0.9% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 0.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $613.92 | −43.2% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 43.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.10s | 13.64s | −15.3% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 15.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Grok 4.6 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/grok-4-6-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/grok-4-6-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill