DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 7.4 points higher (42.2 vs 34.8) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $1081; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 42.2 | +21.3% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 21.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $1,630.69 | +50.8% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 50.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.37s | 11.28s | −26.6% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 26.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 21.3% more intelligence, 50.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 26.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill