DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 28.8 points higher (34.8 vs 6.0) but costs 29× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $37.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 6.0 | −82.8% Ministral 3 14B is 82.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $37.56 | −96.5% Ministral 3 14B is 96.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 8.05s | −49.5% Ministral 3 14B is 49.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 82.8% less intelligence, 96.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill