DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)
Qwen3.7 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 15.2% less intelligence, 110.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 29.5 | −15.2% Qwen3.7 Max is 15.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $2,277.12 | +110.6% Qwen3.7 Max is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 16.67s | +4.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 4.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill