DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 27.0 points higher (34.8 vs 7.8) but costs 6.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 7.8 | −77.6% Solar Pro 3 is 77.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $159.22 | −85.3% Solar Pro 3 is 85.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 18.88s | +18.4% Solar Pro 3 is 18.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 77.6% less intelligence, 85.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 18.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill