DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) scores 18.7 points higher (34.3 vs 15.6) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($200 vs $156; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 15.6 | −54.5% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 54.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $155.87 | −21.9% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 21.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.94s | 6.15s | −65.7% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 65.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.25 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 54.5% less intelligence, 21.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill