DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 35.3% less intelligence, 83.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 22.2 | −35.3% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 35.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $365.63 | +83.2% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 83.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.63s | 8.50s | −51.8% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 51.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gemini-3-5-flash-lite · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gemini-3-5-flash-lite?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill