DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) scores 25.0 points higher (34.3 vs 9.3) but costs 4.5× as much to run the benchmark ($200 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 9.3 | −72.9% Llama 4 Maverick is 72.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $43.98 | −78.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 78.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.91s | 11.18s | −37.6% Llama 4 Maverick is 37.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 72.9% less intelligence, 78.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill