DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) scores 27.8 points higher (34.3 vs 6.5) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($200 vs $73.6; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Scout.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 6.5 | −81.0% Llama 4 Scout is 81.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $73.56 | −63.2% Llama 4 Scout is 63.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.63s | 5.06s | −71.3% Llama 4 Scout is 71.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 81.0% less intelligence, 63.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Llama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill