DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 22.7% less intelligence, 43.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 26.5 | −22.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 22.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $286.07 | +43.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 43.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.04s | 6.26s | −65.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 65.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill