DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
Qwen3.7 Plus vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 26.5% less intelligence, 114.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 150.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 25.2 | −26.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 26.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $427.73 | +114.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.91s | 44.78s | +150.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 150.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill