DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) scores 26.5 points higher (34.3 vs 7.8) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($200 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 7.8 | −77.3% Solar Pro 3 is 77.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $159.22 | −20.2% Solar Pro 3 is 20.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.63s | 18.89s | +7.1% Solar Pro 3 is 7.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 77.3% less intelligence, 20.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill