DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) scores 14.8 points higher (30.4 vs 15.6) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($277 vs $156; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 15.6 | −48.7% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 48.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $155.87 | −43.8% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 43.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.98s | 6.09s | −87.3% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 87.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.25 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 48.7% less intelligence, 43.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill