DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 9.4 points higher (39.8 vs 30.4) but costs 4.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $277; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when you need intelligence above 30.4, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) when 30.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 39.8 | +30.9% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Med… is 30.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $1,100.06 | +296.7% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Med… is 4.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.87s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.75 / $3.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 30.9% more intelligence, 296.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/gemini-3-8-flash-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/gemini-3-8-flash-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill