DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) scores 9.6 points higher (30.4 vs 20.8) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($277 vs $256; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 20.8 | −31.6% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 31.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $255.77 | −7.8% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 7.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.62s | 4.90s | −89.9% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 89.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 31.6% less intelligence, 7.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill