DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 12.3 points higher (42.7 vs 30.4) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $277; both mid-range class). Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 42.7 | +40.5% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 40.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $283.18 | +2.1% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 2.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.95s | 22.62s | −52.8% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 52.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 40.5% more intelligence, 2.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill