DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) scores 4.8 points higher (20.4 vs 15.6) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($451 vs $156; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 15.6 | −23.5% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 23.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $155.87 | −65.4% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 65.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.74s | 6.09s | −9.6% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 9.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.25 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 23.5% less intelligence, 65.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 9.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill