DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Low) scores 13.9 points higher (34.3 vs 20.4) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1013 vs $451; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GLM-5.3 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 34.3 | +68.1% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 68.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $1,012.50 | +124.6% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 2.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.74s | 31.07s | +361.0% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 361.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
GLM-5.3 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 68.1% more intelligence, 124.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 361.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)GLM-5.3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/glm-5-3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/glm-5-3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill