DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (High)
GPT-6 Luna (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 61.3% more intelligence, 89.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | GPT-6 Luna (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 32.9 | +61.3% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 61.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $47.85 | −89.4% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 89.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.81s | 12.43s | +82.5% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 82.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Luna (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/gpt-6-luna-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/gpt-6-luna-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill