DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) scores 11.1 points higher (20.4 vs 9.3) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($451 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 9.3 | −54.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 54.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $43.98 | −90.2% Llama 4 Maverick is 90.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.74s | 10.45s | +55.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 55.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 54.4% less intelligence, 90.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill