DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 109.3% more intelligence, 37.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 249.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 42.7 | +109.3% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $283.18 | −37.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 37.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.74s | 23.52s | +249.0% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 249.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill