DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) scores 1.0 points higher (21.4 vs 20.4) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1145 vs $451; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 21.4 | +4.9% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 4.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $1,145.36 | +154.1% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.81s | 112.14s | +1546.7% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 1546.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 4.9% more intelligence, 154.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1546.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill