DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Grok 4.6 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 0.9 points higher (36.0 vs 35.1) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $614; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.6 (Low).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 35.1 | −2.5% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 2.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $613.92 | −45.3% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 45.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.88s | 14.47s | −44.1% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 44.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 2.5% less intelligence, 45.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Grok 4.6 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/grok-4-6-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/grok-4-6-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill