DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 5.3% more intelligence, 90.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 37.9 | +5.3% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 5.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $109.55 | −90.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 90.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.87s | 49.26s | +90.4% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 90.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill