Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-5.2 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.2 (Max) scores 17.6 points higher (33.7 vs 16.1) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($2097 vs $823; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GLM-5.2 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 2.5 Pro.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GLM-5.2 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 33.7 | +109.3% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $2,097.29 | +154.9% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.13s | 30.10s | +10.9% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 10.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 109.3% more intelligence, 154.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 10.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 2.5 ProGLM-5.2 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/glm-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/glm-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill