Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Luna (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or GPT-5.6 Luna (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (High)
GPT-5.6 Luna (High) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 99.4% more intelligence, 86.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.5% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 32.1 | +99.4% GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is 99.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $108.15 | −86.9% GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is 86.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.16s | 13.41s | −55.5% GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is 55.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
Gemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.6 Luna (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/gpt-5-6-luna-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/gpt-5-6-luna-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill