Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Low) scores 29.7 points higher (45.8 vs 16.1) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1537 vs $823; both premium class). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 2.5 Pro.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 45.8 | +184.5% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 2.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $1,536.78 | +86.8% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 86.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.13s | 11.63s | −57.1% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 57.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 184.5% more intelligence, 86.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 2.5 ProGPT-6 Astra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/gpt-6-astra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/gpt-6-astra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill