Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) scores 10.9 points higher (27.0 vs 16.1) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1528 vs $823; both premium class). Pick Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 2.5 Pro.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 27.0 | +67.7% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 67.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $1,528.20 | +85.7% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 85.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.13s | 60.02s | +129.7% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 129.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 67.7% more intelligence, 85.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 129.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 2.5 ProKimi K2.6 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/kimi-k2-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/kimi-k2-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill