Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 6.8 points higher (16.1 vs 9.3) but costs 19× as much to run the benchmark ($823 vs $44.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 2.5 Pro when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 9.3 | −42.2% Llama 4 Maverick is 42.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $43.98 | −94.7% Llama 4 Maverick is 94.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.13s | 11.18s | −58.8% Llama 4 Maverick is 58.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.2% less intelligence, 94.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 58.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Gemini 2.5 ProLlama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill