Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 35.4% more intelligence, 92.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 21.8 | +35.4% MiMo-V2.5 is 35.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $61.93 | −92.5% MiMo-V2.5 is 92.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.19s | 46.61s | +71.4% MiMo-V2.5 is 71.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Gemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill