Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 9.1 points higher (16.1 vs 7.0) but costs 6.8× as much to run the benchmark ($823 vs $122; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 2.5 Pro when you need intelligence above 7.0, and Mistral Small 3.2 when 7.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 7.0 | −56.5% Mistral Small 3.2 is 56.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $121.78 | −85.2% Mistral Small 3.2 is 85.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.13s | 12.54s | −52.0% Mistral Small 3.2 is 52.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.2 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.5% less intelligence, 85.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Gemini 2.5 ProMistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill