Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 0.5 points higher (16.1 vs 15.6) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($823 vs $661; both premium class). Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 15.6 | −3.1% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 3.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $661.29 | −19.6% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 19.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.26s | 21.22s | −19.2% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 19.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 3.1% less intelligence, 19.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Gemini 2.5 ProQwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill