Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) scores 2.3 points higher (18.4 vs 16.1) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($941 vs $823; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 2.5 Pro.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 18.4 | +14.3% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 14.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $940.97 | +14.4% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 14.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.27s | 64.71s | +128.9% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 128.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 14.3% more intelligence, 14.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 128.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Gemini 2.5 ProQwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/qwen3-5-397b-a17b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/qwen3-5-397b-a17b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill